Culpepper Survey - Equity Compensation and LTI Practices: Trend Towards Diversifying LTI Portfolio Mix Continues - 5 May 2010
Full Article Here
Equity Compensation and LTI
Practices:
Trend Towards Diversifying LTI Portfolio Mix Continues
May
2010
Results from the 2010 Culpepper Equity Compensation &
Long-Term Incentives Practices Survey reveal that an
increasing number of technology and life science companies are
diversifying their equity compensation and long-term incentive
programs for U.S. employees with a portfolio mix of plans.
Topics covered in this report include recent changes to LTI
plans, types of equity and LTI plans offered, eligibility by job
level, stock ownership guidelines, frequency of grant cycles,
vesting, performance measures, risk assessment, and clawback
provisions.
Key Survey
Findings and Trends
-
Changes for 2010: Fifty-five percent of companies reported
making one or more significant changes to their 2010 LTI
plans. The most common changes included reducing the number
of employees eligible for LTI plans and increasing the size of
LTI grants to eligible employees. -
Most Companies Ride Out the Storm of Underwater Stock
Options: Despite facing challenges with underwater options,
most companies have chosen to hold steady with their option
plans and not take action to address underwater options or
drop options in favor of another type of LTI plan. -
Stock Options Continue Reign as LTI King: For most companies
(65%), stock options remain the LTI vehicle of choice. -
Restricted Stock Plans: Restricted stock plans continue to
gain in popularity with over 50 percent of companies
offering them to employees. -
Performance-Based LTI Plans: Nearly one-third of companies
use performance-based LTI plans. However, few companies rely
solely on performance-based LTI plans due to challenges
caused by economic uncertainties in setting performance
targets. -
LTI Portfolio Mixes Increase: An increasing number of
companies with LTI programs are diversifying their LTIs with
a portfolio mix of different types of LTI plans.
Seventy-four percent of companies provide a combination of
two or more types of LTI plans. -
Eligibility Rises with Job Level: The most common criteria
used to determine whether an employee is eligible for
long-term incentives is job level. In most companies,
executives and management-level employees are significantly
more likely to be eligible for long-term incentives than
non-management employees. -
Stock Ownership Guidelines: Most companies do not require
their employees or board directors to own company stock.
However, large public companies are much more likely to have
stock ownership guidelines for executives and board
directors than small and mid-size companies. -
Clawback Provisions: On average, about one-third of
companies reported having clawback provisions in their LTI
plans. However, over 50 percent of large companies have
clawbacks. -
Stock Plan Evergreen Provision: Only nine percent of
companies have stock plans with an evergreen provision that
automatically gives the board of directors a renewable pool
of stock shares each year to distribute to employees. -
ESPPs Increase: An increasing number of companies are
turning to employee stock purchase plans as an alternative
vehicle to provide broad-based employee ownership.
Recent Changes to LTI Plans
Respondents were
asked to report significant changes to equity compensation and
LTI plans over the past two years. Fifty-five percent of
companies reported making one or more significant changes to
their 2010 LTI plans. The most common changes included reducing
the number of employees eligible for LTI plans and increasing
the size of LTI grants to eligible employees (Table 1).
Table 1: Recent Changes to LTI Plans |
||
|
Percent of Companies |
|
2008 to 2009 |
2009 to 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Changes |
|
|
No Significant Changes |
|
|
* Participants could select more than one response. |
Types of Equity Compensation & LTI Plans Offered
Stock options
continue their reign as king of long-term incentives and remain
the LTI vehicle of choice for 65 percent of companies (Table
2).
Click at top of this screen for full article
Topic | Replies | Likes | Views | Participants | Last Reply |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stock Comp Surveys of Interest | 0 | 0 | 847 | ||
ESPP Survey on Plan Features & Trends | 0 | 0 | 656 | ||
Has anyone bought and used the EFES data in the past? | 0 | 0 | 1256 |
I am finding our current survey information to be frustrating and confusing. While data from surveys always differed from provider to provider, the past 18 months of surveys have been particularly volatile.
This surveys shows that 31% of companies are using performance shares. A Grant Thornton survey from less than a year ago had this number at 70%. Other surveys have percentages ranging everywhere in between.
Surveys shows that equity use is both and down.
Executive compensation values are both up and down.
Stock Options use is growing and they are simultaneously being replaced by restricted stock and performance shares.
What is your experience?