Should I do ESPP w/100% stock match after 3 years (not typical 15% discount & no "immediate sell" option)? - 20 Uune 2009
1 followers
0 Likes
This is from a Yahoo question board...
Should I do ESPP w/100% stock match after 3 years (not typical 15% discount & no "immediate sell" option)?
My
employer offers an Employee Stock Purchase Plan with quarterly
"purchase periods" where, instead of offering the typical 15% discount
on the plan shares, they offer a 100% match on the # of shares for each
purchase period - but ONLY 3 years after each purchase period IF I
haven't already sold those shares.
They don't provide the match if I sell them immediately after the
purchase period and b/c the purchase periods are quarterly (i.e. they
are "rolling") I essentially have to keep investing to keep benefiting
from their 100% match.
QUESTION IS: is this worth it (anecdotally speaking)?
My main concern is losing principal - given that they don't match until
3 years out, there's nothing that says that what I'm holding on to
couldn't tank during that time, although the upside is that my shares
will obviously double at that 3 year point. The other thing is that if
I want to receive the match I of course always have to keep investing
quarterly, but I suppose I can always stop my contributions at any time.
QUESTION BEHIND QUESTION: if it's worth it, then when I go to sell
(after the whole match), then I don't ever want to sell under 1/2 of
the stock price that I got in at, right?
There seems to be another question, which is at what price (i.e. the
ceiling) do I no longer buy in at? But I don't think this is relevant
b/c as long as I'm not selling under 1/2 of the stock price that got in
at I should be good?
Seems all pretty straightforward, but I've severely confused myself with trying to think through the scenarios & algebra...
Thanks a ton!
employer offers an Employee Stock Purchase Plan with quarterly
"purchase periods" where, instead of offering the typical 15% discount
on the plan shares, they offer a 100% match on the # of shares for each
purchase period - but ONLY 3 years after each purchase period IF I
haven't already sold those shares.
They don't provide the match if I sell them immediately after the
purchase period and b/c the purchase periods are quarterly (i.e. they
are "rolling") I essentially have to keep investing to keep benefiting
from their 100% match.
QUESTION IS: is this worth it (anecdotally speaking)?
My main concern is losing principal - given that they don't match until
3 years out, there's nothing that says that what I'm holding on to
couldn't tank during that time, although the upside is that my shares
will obviously double at that 3 year point. The other thing is that if
I want to receive the match I of course always have to keep investing
quarterly, but I suppose I can always stop my contributions at any time.
QUESTION BEHIND QUESTION: if it's worth it, then when I go to sell
(after the whole match), then I don't ever want to sell under 1/2 of
the stock price that I got in at, right?
There seems to be another question, which is at what price (i.e. the
ceiling) do I no longer buy in at? But I don't think this is relevant
b/c as long as I'm not selling under 1/2 of the stock price that got in
at I should be good?
Seems all pretty straightforward, but I've severely confused myself with trying to think through the scenarios & algebra...
Thanks a ton!
Link to question: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090620160722AAhwsKl
0 Replies
Reply
Subgroup Membership is required to post Replies
Join ECE - Equity Compensation Experts now
Suggested Posts
Topic | Replies | Likes | Views | Participants | Last Reply |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Restricted stock, RSUs, and Restricted Securities: What to Know | 0 | 0 | 123 | ||
CEP Level 1 | 0 | 0 | 199 | ||
Webinar on Financial Planning With Stock Comp | 0 | 0 | 182 |