Analyzing and Improving Employee Share Purchase Plan Profitability - A Misunderstanding of an ESPP
Analyzing and Improving Employee Share Purchase Plan Profitability
article
by Brandon
on 08 January 2009, tagged as stock option, employee benefits, finances, and economics
Having just come out of my first complete Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)1 “cycle,” I’m somewhat disappointed at how naive I was going in.2
I was so excitemented to buy into a very profitable, guaranteed
investment, that I failed to analyze the steps in detail. Doing so
would have helped me have more realistic expectations, as well as
allowed me to maximize my profit. Hopefully this will help others in my
position fifteen months ago make more informed investment decisions.3
My plan
At first glance, my company’s ESPP seemed almost too good to be true. The high-level process goes like this:
- Near the end of the preceding year, commit to participate and
select an initial contribution amount ranging from 1%-25% of your
income. - Adjust your contribution level as desired throughout the year.
- Contributions cutoff when the total amount contributed reaches a set maximum (e.g., $6,827 in my case in 2008).
- The
financial institution buys company stock with the contributed money at
a 15% discount from the current share price or the share price at the
beginning of the year, whichever is lower.
As far as I could tell, if I sold the stock right after it was
purchase, I would walk away with at least a 15% return on my investment
– greatly exceeding any guaranteed return investments (perhap all of
the non-guaranteed ones, too). Sure, there could be some variation
between the time the stock is purchased and the time my sale goes
through, but it would likely be minor.
A good start
Everything proceeded according to plan through step 3. I enrolled,
set my contribution level and adjusted it as needed – all through an
easy online interface. I didn’t even have to worry about the maximum
value, as my contributions were automatically suspended once I reached
it.
The first wrinkle
Starting from the stock purchase, however, I began to notice
wrinkles in the process – or in my understanding of the process, at
least. A few days into the new year I went online to sell my stock and
reap the 15% profit. Oddly, however, I saw there was still a good
amount of money leftover in the ESPP fund (i.e., money that wasn’t used to buy stock). $2,377.20 – or almost 35% – to be exact.
Needless to say, I was disappointed. I didn’t want to make 15% on
65% of what I invested and 0% on the rest. That’s less than a 10% net
return overall. Yes, it’s better than any other guaranteed investement
I know of, but still.
I investigated despite my disenchantment and found the dollar amount isn’t the only investment limitation in my company’s ESPP;
there’s also a share limit. In this case, the limit was 95 – and it
apparently took only 65% of the dollar maximum buy 95 shares.
(As an aside, I have a difficult time understanding these
limitations. Would something go horribly wrong if employees were
allowed to invest (even ten times) more? And why the extra limitation
(i.e., the share limit) when prices go down? Wouldn’t the company want more investment when prices are on the decline?)
Delays
Another thing I didn’t expect was how long the whole process would
take. I intended to sell the stock (at full price) “as soon as” I
bought it (at a discounted price), but it apprently takes a couple of
days for the transactions to “clear.” When it was all said and done,
six days passed from the time the company bought the shares to the time
the sale finalized.
I must admit I contributed to that delay some. I entered a lower
limit on my order, and it took the stock about a day to surpass the
limit and trigger the sale. Share transactions weren’t the only delays,
however. It also took about six days for the leftover money in my ESPP
account to be transferred to my “core” (or individual) account – i.e.,
to work its way out of the system to where I could use it.
And then, when I thought everything was settled, my withdraw attempt
was thwarted by a delay of “7-10 business days” to confirm my bank
account details. (Granted, I could have set this up ahead of time. I
also won’t have this delay in the future since the account link will
already be setup.)
Taxes and fees
Of course, my company isn’t the only entity wishing to limit my
profit; the financial agency and the government both want in on the
action, too. Fidelity charged a fee to perform the stock share, and
then the government took slices for federal income tax, medicare and
social security:
Fidelity sale fee | $10.95 |
Federal Income Tax | $196.41 |
Social Security Tax | $48.71 |
Medicare Tax | $11.39 |
Calculating profit
Here’s one way at looking at the overall cash flow:
Change | Balance | Notes |
---|---|---|
$6,827.00 | $6,827.00 | starting investment |
($4,449.80) | $2,377.20 | 95 share purchase |
$5,224.97 | $7,602.17 | 95 share sale |
($10.95) | $7,591.22 | Fidelity fee for sale |
($196.41) | $7,394.81 | federal income tax |
($48.71) | $7,346.10 | social security tax |
($11.39) | $7,334.71 | medicare tax |
Subtracting off the initial investment leaves a $507.71 net profit, which corresponds to a ($507.71 / $6827 =
) 7.4%
net return – just under half of what I naively expected. Of course,
some other investments would be charged at the same tax rates, so it’s
worth knowing the return before taxes: ($764.22 / $6827 =
) 11.2%.
Potential improvements
Even without changes in my company’s ESPP plan (or the country’s tax schedules), there are still some things I could do next time to increase my return.
Delay contributions
The shorter my money sits in the ESPP
account before the stock purchase, the better. The regulations state I
must contribute between 1% and 25% of my paycheck throughout the year
in order to participate, but contributions can still be delayed within
this rubric.
For example, if my paycheck is $5,000 each month and the maximum yearly ESPP contribution is $7,500, a “fully delayed” contribution schedule would be as follows:
Month | Contribution % | Contribution $ | Total Contribution |
---|---|---|---|
January | 1% | $50 | $50 |
February | 1% | $50 | $100 |
March | 1% | $50 | $150 |
April | 1% | $50 | $200 |
May | 1% | $50 | $250 |
June | 1% | $50 | $300 |
July | 19% | $950 | $1,250 |
August | 25% | $1,250 | $2,500 |
September | 25% | $1,250 | $3,750 |
October | 25% | $1,250 | $5,000 |
November | 25% | $1,250 | $6,250 |
December | 25% | $1,250 | $7,500 |
The schedule should always end up being a certain number of months
at 1%, one month at an intermediate level, and then the remainder of
the year at 25%. Of course, your salary could change mid-year, which
would throw everything off. Also, if your company limit is high enough
(or your salary low enough), you might pay 25% the whole time and not
reach the maximum. On the flip side, if your company limit is low
enough (or your salary high enough), you might reach the maximum
without ever having to contribute 25% (or even above 1%).
Track stocks
Using the current share price and my investment balance, I can always calculate how many shares I could afford right then.
If that number starts getting close to my limit, then it may be a good
idea to drop my contribution rate back down to 1%. I might not reach
the maximum contribution level, but if the money isn’t going to be used
to buy stock, it’s better off somewhere else (where it will earn
interest).
I have to be careful here, though, as it would be possible to paint
myself into a corner – particularly if I was employing the delayed
contribution schedule I described above. If the share price jumps high
enough at the end of the year, I may not be able to get enough funds
invested to buy a full 95 shares due to the 25% limit. It’s probably
wise, then, to keep a buffer. For example, if the share limit was 100,
the share price had been sitting at around $50 for nine months, and I
already had contributed $6,000, I would feel comfortable dropping my
contribution level down to the minimum. After all, the share price
would have to jump more than $10 for me not to get the maximum
investment – something greatly inconsistent with the price behavior so
far that year.
Conclusions
Despite all of the unexpected twists and missed opportunities, the ESPP
still turned out to be the best place to put my cash – given I was
looking for a guaranteed return over one year. I didn’t see any CDs or
high interest online savings accounts in 2008 that surpassed 4% APY,4
and the highest rate I was paying on an a debt was 5.00% on my
mortgage. These couldn’t hold a candle to the 11.2% and 7.4% returns
(respectively) on the ESPP.5
Notes
1 “Employee Stock Purchase Plan – ESPP.” Investopedia.com. Accessed January 2009 from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/espp.asp. My employer uses an alternate name, “Employee Share Purchase Plan.”
2 Hansen, Brandon. “Stock Purchase Plans vs Extra Mortgage Payments.” OmniNerd, 28 August 2007. Accessed January 2009 from http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Stock_Purchase_Plans_vs_Extra_Mortgage_Payments. Thanks to OmniNerd, my nativity is recorded for the world to see!
3 I’m not a professional consultant or anything of the sort. If you happen to lose money following my advice, I will sue you. So now we’re even.
4 If you’re looking for the best interest rate around, check out bankrate.com.
5 The savings account return is taxable, so it should be compared to the pre-tax ESPP return (11.2%). Avoiding mortgage interest, on the other hand, is not taxable, so it is compared to the after-tax ESPP
return (7.4%). The mortgage interest comparison is even a little more
complicated than that, as mortgage interest sometimes qualifies as a
tax writeoff. Thus, although making extra payments on your home allows
you to pay much less interest in the long run, you also pay less
interest in the short term. Granted, the change is likely to be small,
but it’s possible that slight writeoff reduction it could slip you into
a higher tax bracket.
Thread parent sort order:
Thread verbosity:
Another
point a friend at work brought up is that we already know one of the
two share prices from which the discounted price will be calculated.
Combined with the share limit for this year, we can predict exactly how
much money we need to contribute to cover a full investment – if the share price stays the same or goes up.
So, the only time you’d need to track the share price is if it was below the price at the beginning of the year.
Interesting article!!!
What uou have n’t considered here the time which is a big factor.
The return can he higher if the sale price go further up (instead of
54.99).
One other thing :
If you hold securities for more than one year, any gains from the
sale of these securities are called Long-term capital gains, and are
taxed at 15% as opposed to the ordinary income rate of up to 35%. This
will lower your profit futher than the calculated one (7.4%)!
In retrospect we don’t know whether the price will go below 15% discounted price!
I saw this blog posting and thought it perfectly demonstrated how an poor or insufficient communication ca result in upset plan participants.
How would you have avoided this situation?
Topic | Replies | Likes | Views | Participants | Last Reply |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Restricted stock, RSUs, and Restricted Securities: What to Know | 0 | 0 | 123 | ||
CEP Level 1 | 0 | 0 | 199 | ||
Webinar on Financial Planning With Stock Comp | 0 | 0 | 182 |
2 Nerd-Its
ESPP thoughts
by Anonymous
:: NR0
::
Show
Good article. Since ESPP are on the fringes of what I deal with for a living, four observations:
year will be one of the best years possible for you to participate. I
will guess your return may double if you hold for 2 years with as cheap
as your company’s stock is.
after the “purchase date,” you are taxed at long-term capital gains
(15%), as opposed to the higher ordinary income rate.
-C
Posted about 19 hours ago,
Hide,
Reply