Olagues v. Icahn in the U.S. Court of Appeals Second Circuit

Why would anyone write (sell) puts on a share of stock trading for $30.00 for one penny per share when the value of the puts is 100 times as valuable?

The above was exactly what Carl Icahn did.

Along with the writing of the puts at one penny, he bought calls for their intrinsic value or very close to the intrinsic value from the person who bought the puts at one penny. Intrinsic value means the difference between the exercise price and the value of the stock.

So rather than paying the true theoretical value of $11.00 for the calls with an exercise price of $20.00, he paid $10.01. Essentially Icahn bought the calls undervalued by the same amount as he sold the puts under valued.

Now why would he do such a thing?

Was the margin requirements lower with the lower prices?

Were the taxes different than the taxes would have been if he used the real values?

Were the true values of the written puts recoverable by the issuer if there was a violation of SEC Rule 16 b-6(d)?. Icahn admitted the violation but how much did the issuers recover

I know the answers.

But if selling puts and buying calls at artificially low prices resulted in large benefits compared with buying stock straight out, why would anyone buy stock in the traditional ways?

 

John Olagues

 

 

Edited Tue, Sep 26, 2017 4:00 AM

Post Reply

You must be logged in and a member of this Groupsite in order to post a reply to this topic.
To post a reply, contact your group manager(s) Join this Groupsite

 

ECE - Equity Compensation Experts
Powered by Groupsite.com

Visibility Public Membership By Invitation or Approved Request Default Profile Professional

Your Status Not Logged-In