Asymmetric Taxation and Performance-Based Incentive Contracts - 11 Mar 2011

1 followers
0 Likes

http://bit.ly/ge4PmB


This paper analyzes the effects of symmetric and asymmetric taxation on
performance-based versus fixed remuneration contracts. I integrate a
proportional corporation tax and a proportional wage tax into a binary
principal-agent model. The wage tax increases the remuneration costs and
makes the agent's employment less attractive. Thus, the principal tends
to demand lower rather than higher effort or does not offer a contract
at all. In contrast to the wage tax, the corporate tax is irrelevant for
the optimal remuneration contract. Under asymmetric corporate taxation,
the principal tends to offer contracts less frequently. Fixed
remuneration contracts are penalized more heavily by asymmetric taxation
than performance-based remuneration contracts.

0 Replies
Reply
Subgroup Membership is required to post Replies
Join ECE - Equity Compensation Experts now
Dan Walter
about 13 years ago
0
Replies
0
Likes
1
Followers
652
Views
Liked By:
Suggested Posts
TopicRepliesLikesViewsParticipantsLast Reply
Stock Option Glossary Definition- As defined by a Duke University resource.
ECE Administrator
about 12 years ago
001054
ECE Administrator
about 12 years ago
Does it benefit companies to give stock options to every employee or just executives?
ECE Administrator
over 12 years ago
00918
ECE Administrator
over 12 years ago
"Multiple Choice Employee Stock Options" Presentation
John Olagues
about 13 years ago
00868
John Olagues
about 13 years ago